PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

The official PB section

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby xtripsnova on Sun Apr 27, 2025 9:20 am

If he was an animal he would be a chihuahua, lots of noise, miserable in size and inconsequential
Ban facials. Bring back that vibe. Bring real women.
User avatar
xtripsnova
Legendary! Major Wynner
 
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby piranorton on Sun Apr 27, 2025 12:00 pm

xtripsnova wrote:She is just tainted because she was on PL so many times. So what?

It's a matter of taste. I had never heard of her or seen her before - I saw the first pic Greg posted and immediately hard passed. I don't think she objectively qualifies as attractive, but even if she does, I don't really care, the gut feeling is stronger. I'm still glad this update exists, PB is back, and that's what matters.
User avatar
piranorton
piranorton
 
Posts: 517
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2022 4:02 pm

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby xtripsnova on Sun Apr 27, 2025 1:02 pm

^ It really is not a matter of being attractive or not. Can we agree she is not repulsive like a few that were actually on PB?
The thing is that obviously PB has been through a rough patch lately and it seems that PL came to the rescue with this one, just for the time being.
I won't be surprised if we get more like these in the next few weeks, or more. I guess they need to signal somehow that they are back... That way hopefully they will be back afloat and book new girls from abroad.....
Where from? Well that is a mistery.... If that is true that south americans are a no go then they might have to reinvent themselves and look elsewhere.....
Ban facials. Bring back that vibe. Bring real women.
User avatar
xtripsnova
Legendary! Major Wynner
 
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby thebowl on Sun Apr 27, 2025 11:59 pm

xtripsnova wrote:^ It really is not a matter of being attractive or not. Can we agree she is not repulsive like a few that were actually on PB?.....


This is pretty much my point. It's not like she is my favourite or anything, I just didn't think that reaction was totally fair. Some guy can go on and on about how gorgeous Emily Walters is, and I can enjoy the scene, but I'm not head over heels for her either. I think it's safe to say you aren't going to be in love with every single girl that does PB.
thebowl
Respected member
 
Posts: 263
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 4:29 pm

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby Mack on Mon Apr 28, 2025 12:09 am

I don't think there's anything wrong with having Eme Jote on PB.
I think it's great that young women live out their bucket list of swallowing gallons of sperm.
Eme actually has a decent body and okay face.
The only hideous thing about her are her fingernails.
I hope she swallows 200 (real) loads.

But no one will ever be better as Nona.

Long live PB!!
Please keep getting more women to cum and swallow cum.
Mack
Respected member
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:06 am

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby piranorton on Mon Apr 28, 2025 9:03 am

xtripsnova wrote:^ It really is not a matter of being attractive or not. Can we agree she is not repulsive like a few that were actually on PB?

I would never call her repulsive, she's just a certain phenotype I don't like and given PB's casting track record I have the luxury to pass on her. Who's on your repulsive list? I know you don't like bubbly girls like Chloe Lapiedra or Min, were they a hard pass for you? Is Eme more attractive (not necessarily in terms of looks) than them?
User avatar
piranorton
piranorton
 
Posts: 517
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2022 4:02 pm

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby xtripsnova on Mon Apr 28, 2025 10:33 am

piranorton wrote:
xtripsnova wrote:^ It really is not a matter of being attractive or not. Can we agree she is not repulsive like a few that were actually on PB?

I would never call her repulsive, she's just a certain phenotype I don't like and given PB's casting track record I have the luxury to pass on her. Who's on your repulsive list? I know you don't like bubbly girls like Chloe Lapiedra or Min, were they a hard pass for you? Is Eme more attractive (not necessarily in terms of looks) than them?


What????? Where did you get that impression from? Min is very attractive, except maybe when she is acting weird, but then again putting the video on mute solves the problem. Chloe is potentially very nice too, and her reactions are priceless. I just don't like the braces, but I can get passed that easily. No, I will give you a few exemples of repulsive PB models: Alyrex for the buttox, Anita Blanche for everything, Blair Saenz, Dayana Teen, Freya Dee for the anorexic body, Lily Veroni, Veronica Avluv, to name a few....
Ban facials. Bring back that vibe. Bring real women.
User avatar
xtripsnova
Legendary! Major Wynner
 
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby Playabuoy on Mon Apr 28, 2025 12:32 pm

Prim deleted her IG ? Is she on x(Twitter)?
Playabuoy
Respected member
 
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 6:23 am

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby Gregorious on Wed Apr 30, 2025 8:54 am

LP/Analvids model 21yo Bruna Santos from Brazil in the PB studio...
https://x.com/Brunasantosgt
https://www.instagram.com/brunasantos.gt

Bruna Santos_PB.png
Bruna Santos_PB.png (903.77 KiB) Viewed 3163 times

-----------------------------------------------------------

Hmmm...
https://x.com/Sandritachicas

Sandritachicass.png
Sandritachicass.png (49.04 KiB) Viewed 3075 times
Gregorious
Glorious Gregorious
 
Posts: 2791
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:52 pm

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby DrinkIt on Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:16 am

^^^^^^^Now thats more like it 8)
User avatar
DrinkIt
Respected member
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 4:30 pm

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby MassiveFacials on Wed Apr 30, 2025 12:45 pm

^^ Absolute disaster if this is the sort of girls we're going to be seeing regularly. If it's the sort of thing you're into, by all means, enjoy it. But woof, to have this hiatus and this be one of the first scenes (seemingly) we'll be getting...that's horrible :shock:
MassiveFacials
Almost human
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2021 5:20 am

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby Gregorious on Wed Apr 30, 2025 1:43 pm

Hard to say what the new season will be like. But I'm NOT looking forward to see a line of Legalporno "I do anything" models being booked. At least I hope to see some variation.

I realise these LP/Analvids models are probably the easy ones to get, and they can be good performers. But it's not the kind of models that make me look forward to the scene. The same goes for any established "pornstars", US or Europe.

That said each scene should be judge on its own merits. No matter who the model is, it's the actual published video that matters...

---------------------------------------------
Seems like it might be Bruna coming up before Eme Jota

Bruna Santos_a.jpg
Bruna Santos_a.jpg (202.06 KiB) Viewed 2815 times
Gregorious
Glorious Gregorious
 
Posts: 2791
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:52 pm

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby JamesB on Wed Apr 30, 2025 4:38 pm

I've said it before and I'll say it again. They could hire the hottest women in the world, swallowing hundreds of loads, but it wouldn't make any difference until they fix the lighting, video quality and camerawork (Gregorious has explained the problem below better than I could). You could have [insert your favourite celebrity] gulping down mouthful after mouthful, but if the final image is bad and the camerawork is all over the place, it's just boring to watch.

Gregorious wrote:^4K or not, sadly it still gonna look like shit as long as they use a combination of

a) extreme studio lightning blowing out the picture and
b) unnatural "retouched look" color grading.

The opposite of natural clear crisp picture. I really hate it, ruining scene after scene.

Especially the sperm in the models mouth look like some kind of blurry undefined white paint instead or real sticky sperm. Do they deliberately want to make the scenes look as weak, harmless and unnatural as possible?
JamesB
25 post? Our bitch!
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2023 5:58 pm

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby Gregorious on Wed Apr 30, 2025 5:01 pm

^Judging from the trailer Eme Jota #1 seems to be an improvement as far as the lighting and color grading goes. It actually looks pretty natural.

But we have to wait for the full scene to judge.
----------------------------------------------------------

Bruna Santos trailer: https://premiumbukkake.com/trailers/PB_424_brunasantos.mp4

Well, I'm looking forward more to Eme Jota, I like her "regular girl" look...
Gregorious
Glorious Gregorious
 
Posts: 2791
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:52 pm

Re: PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

Postby xtripsnova on Wed Apr 30, 2025 5:26 pm

^ Well that's a scene to avoid on 4K at all costs. The lower resolution the better. Her skin is a warzone.
Ban facials. Bring back that vibe. Bring real women.
User avatar
xtripsnova
Legendary! Major Wynner
 
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 6:11 pm

PreviousNext

Return to PREMIUM BUKKAKE OFFICIAL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests