Taylor Sands

by **Raytech** on Sat Jun 13, 2015 5:56 pm

VivThomas - Amber Nevada, Taylor Sands - Gilet
Site: VivThomas.com

by **Raytech** on Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:04 am

VivThomas - Amber Nevada, Taylor Sands - Gambling Episode 1 - Bouillotte
Site: VivThomas.com

by **Raytech** on Wed Jun 17, 2015 8:48 pm

VivThomas - Amarna Miller, Taylor Sands - Illicit
Site: VivThomas.com

by **paroxysmia** on Thu Jun 25, 2015 2:46 am

Awesome pussy! My new fav!

oldje.com (b/g)
http://www.classmodels.com/taylor-sands ... ution-1803

by **david-perfectgonzo** on Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:28 am

IMO people get carried away with the "4k" moniker now just like they got carried away with HD back in 2005. It's an overused marketing gimmick and most consumers don't understand the fundamentals.

HD or 4k would only look as good as the bandwidth you apply during the encode. Perfectgonzo's HD videos are currently encoded at 14 mbit, a typical 50 minute scene is a 5GB download. Only 20% of members download these, 80% stick with the smaller resolutions. I'm happy for those 20% though as they love the high resolution and ultra high quality.

We're shooting in 4k since Sept 2014 but we're not uploading the 4k scenes yet. I see some sites advertise "4k quality" but of course many are skimping on the bandwidth. 4k encoded at 15 mbit looks like shit, just like HD encoded at 5 mbit looks like a joke. Yes I can scream "4k" or "HD" but the quality is too bad so why bother? IMO if you want to play the 4k game without compromising on bandwidth (=bullshitting your customers) you have to encode at something like 40-60 mbit. That gives you a similar bandwidth/pixel ratio as 10-15mbit at HD. So we're talking about 50GB downloads for a 50 minute scene or ~1GB per minute. I curious how many customers would download these with current costs of storage and home DSL/cable speeds? 1%? 2%? So then we'd have 80% downloading the lower resolutions, 18% HD, 2% 4k.

We have invested in a huge redundant storage array solution that will allow us to host hundreds of 50GB scenes. It's all in place and ready, but my personal opinion is the time isn't right yet. I haven't gotten a single email/message from members asking for 4k versions of our videos. They ask for all kinds of things but 4k is not one of them... yet.

Any opinions here from hardcore porn fans? Do you download 4k versions for your personal porn collection? How big are they/what bandwidth do they use? Do you watch them on your 4k TV? Do you have a 4k monitor?

by **coil** on Thu Jun 25, 2015 4:17 am

Perhaps another thread is better suited for discussions about resolution, bitrates, and preferences regarding videos. Just a suggestion, since this is the Taylor Sands thread.

by **Pierre Woodman** on Thu Jun 25, 2015 5:25 pm

I think David is right in many points but as for me the 4K is a success on my website even if compressed at 20 Mb/s ( sometime 30 Mb/s if files is short time ). I shoot only in 4K actually ...
But yes it's Taylor Sands topic so maybe someone should create a specific topic as someone did on my forum :
http://www.woodmanforum.com/with-pierre ... t7033.html

But definitely the 4K is a great thing !!!

PW

by **Frigo** on Thu Jun 25, 2015 5:29 pm

Full HD is more than enough in my opinion. so I completely agree to David!

by **paroxysmia** on Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:15 pm

Awesome facial @ DP:

digitalplayground.com (b/g, lez)
http://www.digitalplayground.com/flixxx ... obsession/
http://babesource.com/galleries/taylor- ... -3776.html

And it's with the awesome Stella Cox too!

by **Pierre Woodman** on Tue Jun 30, 2015 7:03 pm

Coming tonight :

: Taylor-Sands-Wunf-160.jpg (151.93 KiB) Viewed 18943 times

PW

by **david-perfectgonzo** on Tue Jun 30, 2015 9:39 pm

Pierre Woodman wrote:I think David is right in many points but as for me the 4K is a success on my website even if compressed at 20 Mb/s ( sometime 30 Mb/s if files is short time ).

It's awesome your customers enjoy them, I know they're real porn fanatics and very educated and knowledgeable fans. I will put up a couple of 4k clips later this summer and check feedback from mine.

My apologies to the thread for the offtopic -- back to beautiful Taylor Sands.

by **Pierre Woodman** on Wed Jul 01, 2015 12:34 am

Yes my friend, with the quality of your camera, it will be awesome for sure !!!

PW

by **Querlatte** on Wed Jul 01, 2015 10:51 am

Taylor Sands at legalporno.com :!:

by **Pierre Woodman** on Wed Jul 01, 2015 12:58 pm

WakeUpnFuck # 160 with Taylor Sands.
http://enter.wakeupnfuck.com/ttrack/OS4 ... f-160.8160

PW

by **paroxysmia** on Wed Jul 01, 2015 7:35 pm

Awesome girl, super body and unusual pussy for a small model like her!

Add:
pornostatic.com (b/g)
http://www.killergram.com/episodes.asp? ... ornostatic

Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Re: Taylor Sands

Who is online