Taylor Sands

[phelan]

http://www.woodmancastingx.com/casting-x/taylor-sands-hard-bed-5_7961.html

[Pierre Woodman]

Taylor-Sands-hardcore-with-5-cocks.jpg (81.94 KiB) Viewed 20400 times

[paroxysmia]

OMG! How is it possible I miss dat girl?
Great casting! And her pussy is pretty wet in many scenes she shot.



Add:
bangbus.com (b/g)
http://www.bangbrosnetwork.com/t1/pps=l ... ?s=bb14367

[rashidnz]

Hello
some pics from the bangbus scene

[crimsonking]

at noboring.com

[paroxysmia]

at noboring.com

Wrong girl!

[shark1]

That 4 on 1 scene from Woodman is truly some of the worst HD video ever shot. It looks like SD quality that was extrapolated to 1920X1080 resolution. Not a second of that video wasn't grainy. Did you shoot this video 15 years ago?

[coil]

My thoughts exactly ^

[Pierre Woodman]

Tell what you want about the video quality, my hairy ass or what ever, the screen capture above just shows how is the video aspect and I suggest you try to download a full resolution HD on my site instead watch it on a pirate poor quality site ...
And if we are speaking about resolution, just this week on my site I have put few new 4K videos and try not forget I was the first in Europe to give my members 4K to upload from begining of 2014 !!!

4k-casting-from-WCX.jpg (72.03 KiB) Viewed 19563 times

Anyway Taylor Sands is actually my 5th best sale of may 2015, and no one has complain about this video ! ( and BTW learn to count, it's a 5 on 1 not 4 so I'm not even sure you have seen the video )

Sales-WCX-05-2015.jpg (105.16 KiB) Viewed 19560 times

Maybe some of you are a bit jealous to see she's still anal exclusive to me but be relax, she told me last week that she got a good proposal and this summer she will start give her little flower to someone else !!!

PW

[shark1]

Tonight Dped by 4 boys !!!

Taylor-Sands-destroyed-by-4-men.jpg

PW

Perhaps it is you who needs to learn to count the men in your own scenes, I quoted your earlier post saying there was 4 boys in the scene! Also, as usual you say it must be a pirated version, but it is a version from your own site! While your HD videos are usually far from the best quality but still watchable, this particular one was absolutely horrible. Again, not a second of that video was not grainy, even if you shrink the video to SD resolution it is awful for SD!! I don't know what you did with this particular video, but the quality is horrendous! One thing you have never been is honest about your own faults!

[Pierre Woodman]

Not true, I am for sure one of the person the most taking care about what is coming out but yes sometime if light conditions are lower the quality become less high of course.
But I was the first with DV in october 1995, first with HD in April 2005 and first in europe with 4K in april 2014 ( Dorcel put is first 4K video online last monday, and LP no one yet !!! )
But because things can be out of my control sometime, about Taylor video, I just download myself the HD version from my website and did a screen capture just now. The original picture was 2,7 Mo but I have been obliged reduced it to 216 ko for EBI ( max 256 ko) , so it's 10 times bader in theory and I got this :

Taylor-Sands-+-5.jpg (213.01 KiB) Viewed 19224 times

I will not pretend it's "wonderfull " because we were shooting with mostly ambiance light, but it's not as you said. Also the screen capture with 4 dicks above this page has been reduced a lot but still shows the level of how it looks ...

PW

[Goldstar]

I am still surprised by the way that nobody talks about her pussy shape?
I mean, I don't think I have ever seen such a long slit, especially not on such a small little girly.
I think it is save to say that she will not have any problems delivering a baby!

2015-06-03_143324.jpg (65.77 KiB) Viewed 19185 times

Original photo:
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=22637&start=45#p308229

I wonder if her sweet cunny is tight?

[shark1]

Not true, I am for sure one of the person the most taking care about what is coming out but yes sometime if light conditions are lower the quality become less high of course.
But I was the first with DV in october 1995, first with HD in April 2005 and first in europe with 4K in april 2014 ( Dorcel put is first 4K video online last monday, and LP no one yet !!! )
But because things can be out of my control sometime, about Taylor video, I just download myself the HD version from my website and did a screen capture just now. The original picture was 2,7 Mo but I have been obliged reduced it to 216 ko for EBI ( max 256 ko) , so it's 10 times bader in theory and I got this :

I will not pretend it's "wonderfull " because we were shooting with mostly ambiance light, but it's not as you said. Also the screen capture with 4 dicks above this page has been reduced a lot but still shows the level of how it looks ...

PW

Yes, the FullHD version I have is 2.71 Gb. Download the FullHD version of the movie and watch it and tell me if it isn't unusually grainy compared to the rest of your FullHD vids.

[horndogger]

Pierre, you don't have a studio, you shoot in hotel rooms. How can you compare your video quality to LP or Dorcel ?

[Pierre Woodman]

Did I said I compare my video with them ? Do you think a studio is better than a hotel room when sun is shinning outside ? The quality of the video ( or photo ) depend of the material you're using but also how you decide to compress the original quality when put it online !
EBI is not the place where I can show you this because we are not allowed to put pictures over 256 ko here. But anyway, I'm not the guy with who you should try to fight about photo or video material, all people in porn business knows there are very few men so much focus on that in our little world. Since I'm 9 years old I do photography, and at 11 years old I had my own black room to develop images. I have a 4K topic on my forum where I discuss with fans about it since January 7.2014 http://www.woodmanforum.com/with-pierre ... t7033.html and sorry to tell you that even my friend Gregory Dorcel asked me different advise about the 4K.
But there is no miracle, a shot in studio with strong light like LP does, gives a better result than a hotel room with ambiance light, but then it's a personal choice and of course I have decided when begin the work exclusively on the web to stop using big cameras for a question of maniability. From that moment, clearly you go down in term of sharpness but is this so important ? I don't think so, I prefer sacrified a bit the quality to be able give my members better angle in action ( big cameras doesn't let you do it ) and anyway technology works for all of us, so the futur is just bringing better and better material.
Anyway from April this year I started shoot all in 4K, and whatever you can said, my "hotel room videos in 4K" ( even if compressed at only 20mb/s) give a much higher sharpness than any HD from any company of the world ...
Here is what gives my "new baby" at end zooming , but I had to destroy the quality to put it here ( originaly was 12Mo) :

Originaly.jpg (209.31 KiB) Viewed 18967 times

PW