[Poll] Anal and/or pussy in porn?

[dap-addict]

And DAP openly admits that the whole thing is self-serving, to provide support for his "vital concern" and agenda with the producers (which seems pretty ridiculous to me). But for god's sake, this all gets too serious for me sometimes, and i know i'm as much at fault as anyone here.

Me, too!
But I also know now that I am not the only 1 with my option, but now already 28% feel like me.
Maybe I am also too serious, but for sure some producers read this forum...and some of them may draw the conclusions.

[hopless3]

Actually if this poll is self serving I'd like my vote removed because we should acknowledge that in sexuality there many different tastes.

dap-addict would have no Pussy only or blow-job only porn but why should he decide that I or anyone else can't like it even if he finds it "Boring". Some people actually like soft core ( Theres no accounting for some peoples taste ) or even non porn models but how would you make a rule like you must do dap.

At what point would a model have no choice but to do this? If she's done swimsuit pics? Topless? Or just been paid to pose fully clothed?

In some ways I liked the days when some girls did and some girls didn't. You had soft core models, hard core models and the real special ones who would do the more extreme sets. Now you just get a homogeneous mix.

[laura]

I would be interested to know if we have all shifted in our porn tastes over the years as we get older(or hornier!) And whether or not once upon a time we would have chosen a different option - or would porn lovers in general not be so turned on by more extreme acts say 10 or 15 years ago? Had this poll been cast in the 80's would there have been an overwhelming number of votes cast in favour of cunt only or lesbian porn with anal considered to be just that bit too pervy? Personally my own tastes have shifted into the anal only camp but if you asked me the same question 5 years ago i would possibly chose pussy only with a touch of light anal. What about you guys? X

[Camarillobrillo]

What about you guys? X

I find my tastes has basically remained the same over the years.

I like porn to be varied...foreplay, bj, pussy and anal are all ok and all appreciated when well mixed into a scene.
I honestly see gapes, daps and other extremes more as stunts...and i'm not that much into it.

Oh...and, when well shot, i also happen to like lez and solo girls work quite a lot.

I guess this just put me on the "softer" side of the forum right ?

[hopless3]

The 80's dam it was hard to get hold of porn then. Hardcore was illegal until the late 90's in the UK.

This may seen strange now but what hardcore we could get was usually full of models who couldn't make money in the soft porn market i.e. they weren't that good looking (not ugly but not beautiful either). So in that respect we are better off now. I think that was why Private built up such a good reputation because it was able to get the better looking models to do hardcore. There was a model Andrea Clark, who in 89 was the worlds most photographed model (more photo sets than Cindy Crawford and Naomi Campbell) and though she did almost exclusively solo nudes they got her to be double & triple penetrated. These days almost any mag/website/video producer can get girls with "supermodel" good looks to be gang-banged.

I'm guessing here but I suspect that because porn can be obtained much more easily on the web and without an age limit imposed on the down loader that teens get used to seeing the more extreme sex acts and so see them as normal. Hence the people going into porn just see these as normal and so it gets easier to find people who are willing to do them.

[laura]

Some good comments guys. I cant imagine how awful it would be now living in england under a ban of hardcore porn! How boring and draconian? Trying to suppress what is a sex obsessed nation! Ps who was andrea clark? American? Any pics i am intrigued! X

[alexxx]

The 80's dam it was hard to get hold of porn then. Hardcore was illegal until the late 90's in the UK.

This may seen strange now but what hardcore we could get was usually full of models who couldn't make money in the soft porn market i.e. they weren't that good looking (not ugly but not beautiful either). So in that respect we are better off now. I think that was why Private built up such a good reputation because it was able to get the better looking models to do hardcore. There was a model Andrea Clark, who in 89 was the worlds most photographed model (more photo sets than Cindy Crawford and Naomi Campbell) and though she did almost exclusively solo nudes they got her to be double & triple penetrated. These days almost any mag/website/video producer can get girls with "supermodel" good looks to be gang-banged.

I'm guessing here but I suspect that because porn can be obtained much more easily on the web and without an age limit imposed on the down loader that teens get used to seeing the more extreme sex acts and so see them as normal. Hence the people going into porn just see these as normal and so it gets easier to find people who are willing to do them.

I think you exaggerate the number of sets of Andrea Clarke (who was in every magazine in the '80s)...but the role of Private guys has been quite important after the end of many pioneers from '70s.
Generally I agree with you that now we are better. There's much more variety and everybody's taste can be satisfied. The quality also is higher (technically and artistically).
This variety in the product is also in the public: you can find people in the '60s (the early baby-boomers) who watch porn like their sons...and their grandchildren... who do it illegally as many of us did it 20 years ago. Just because of that you can find evrything from solo softcore to extreme fetish.
Of course different ages (and sex too) watch different products (there are some stats which are regularly used by some nerds behind big productions like Kink-com)...usually you start with pussy but after a while everybody wanna have a look into anal because we are all curious...but somebody still prefer a perfect hygiene and dislike it. So productions follow this path...just to provide fun and entertainment to a wider public. It's a big dream factory where few rules are valid... one of them is also that you do first what public will buy and then what you like.
But you can always do your private amateur...

[laura]

I think in conclusion it is fair to say that the modern age gives all of us a little what we all like- and that is a good thing. Some of us just lust for tight bodied teens with open arses while some of us just lust for old fashioned glamour that highlights the sheer beauty of the female body. Some of us drool over gapes while others lust for a nicely trimmed vagina or a nice big dick. What i am trying to say is that variety is the spice of life and providing it is legal and consentual then each to their own x

[just_me]

Yeah, it's clear why I'm in the 1% here, and not in the middle of the herd

Years ago, actually about 2002/2003, I started checking out the works of an American girl who was doing just soft photography work. So cute, so full of energy. After some time goes by I see word she had done her first shoot with a guy! Excited as I thought this was going to be, I pulled out the credit card and subscribed to the website to download the video. What I got was a video of this girl now skinny as a twig and a very dull/lifeless presence to her. She went on to be in several more boy/girl scenes for the cheapest of websites, before settling in to a career in bondage - and not the nicer bondage - the stuff that looks very painful. It was sad watching the life pulled out of her over the years. The idiot I was, asked myself the question, what did I pay to watch happen to this girl? What did I pay pornographers to do to this girl? Is this what I want to be entertained by?

When I read guys offer guesses on why others do not like hard porn like they do, I've yet to see anyone here be even remotely close. I can turn most everything about porn in to a baseball analogy, and with this, the reason I do not watch hard porn is for the very same reason I will never like steroids in baseball. And I can hear the murmurs of the European forum "Baseball? What the fuck is that?" And of course, "How then did this idiot find his way on to the EBI board?" And in perpetuity, "Why is he talking to himself?" And finishing, "Why did I waste my time reading all that?"

[hopless3]

I think you exaggerate the number of sets of Andrea Clarke (who was in every magazine in the '80s)

In 89 I did see a mag proclaiming that Andrea was the most photographed model in the world claiming this info came from some official source (I don't remember what)

But you can always do your private amateur...

That also was difficult since cameras were film and you had to send it off to be developed.

[dap-addict]

Actually if this poll is self serving I'd like my vote removed because we should acknowledge that in sexuality there many different tastes.

dap-addict would have no Pussy only or blow-job only porn but why should he decide that I or anyone else can't like it even if he finds it "Boring". Some people actually like soft core ( Theres no accounting for some peoples taste ) or even non porn models but how would you make a rule like you must do dap.

At what point would a model have no choice but to do this? If she's done swimsuit pics? Topless? Or just been paid to pose fully clothed?

You got me totally wrong, hopeless!
My poll is self-serving in that way, that one of the admins claimed I was the only one here who liked anal only porn and who would always <FF> the pussy only parts. I wanted to find out wheter it really is like this. And I did - its not, we are over 25% of the forum!
Once I realized I was far from being the only one I pointed out that if directors read this poll, they can find out that every 4th poster of this forum would like anal/dap only, i.e. more of this fetish than is currectly produced. In this sense it is self-serving. But I also pointed out before that every 2nd forum poster still wants to see pussy only.
So, it would be a completely wrong biz move to stop shooting pussy porn. And I certainly never demanded that! The same is also valid for solo and lez only.
On a side line I can tell you I would already be happy for easy skipping options and a good fetish menue on all dvds.

[dap-addict]

...much more interesting is laura`s question:

I can tell you, laura, that until the mid 90ties I tried very hard to get dp movies. I also wasnt that anal centred in my porn watching interests than now.
But than I spotted the first dap...and a bit later I started to watch JYL`s anal (and dap) kuckmal movies. This changed my viewing habbits very much.

[priapos]

And I did - its not, we are over 25% of the forum!

WRONG

You & your fellow travelers are merely 25% of those who responded to this poll.. Not 25% of those on the forum or even 25% of those who post regularly. Self-serving and self-deluding, i would say

[dap-addict]

A poll like an election is always a sample. That`s democracy. And it also works worldwide for product suveeys from washing powder to cars.
We cannot force people to vote. If we can collect 100 votes here that`s a lot. If we would poll about your three favorite girls you`d not complain, I guess.

[priapos]

All polls, whether for the American president or American idol, are more or less flawed in absolute terms. But meaningful polls should be scientifically conducted, based on established theoretical and empirical methods. The polls for the girls are just beauty contests for the fun of it. And whoever said this forum was a democracy anyway

But if all this makes you feel better about yourself DAPaddict, i wont attempt to disillusion you any further.. Still, if i were selling soap, i wouldn't want you directing market research