Page 1 of 4

Saturated with porn

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:41 pm
by superduper
Is there too much porn, or just enough, or not enough ?

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:33 pm
by gape
too much of the same porn!

Industry with many players all having a slice of the cake.

Be nice to see more niche markets, or something with a little more interest. OK i know there is loads of niche material but make the porn we watch more interesting. How? I don't know?

More interesting positions
More Bathroom Scenes
more toys, I wanna see a girl walk around with a Pig Tail Butt Plug or a butt plug with a tail! Simple, and I hardly ever see it.

Just something more please! (or something for me a eventually get bored with)

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:14 am
by camaban
Good porn can never be enough. But most of the stuff released today is not good, quantity counts over quality.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:25 am
by Billbo
There are too many tease sites and tease materials out there. Some sites, like Twistys, have some really nice looking women, but every photoshoot of the last year is a dildo shoot. Really gets old. 20 sets of even the prettiest girl gets old when it is exactly the same subject matter. Even my long time favorite model to look at, Zuzana Drabinova, gets somewhat old after seeing 100 sets of exactly the same thing. To paraphrase Richard II, my bank account for a b/g scene from some of these women...

Too many sites where some dolt goes out with their handycam and makes 2 videos of the neighborhood college kids and wants to sell them. Never bought a membership for that nonsense and won't, ever. If one want's CGA quality, go rent a 1970s VCX video. One can at least laugh at the hairstyles.

Too many sites that don't bother to fix their sites when something doesn't work. That really makes people want to sign up-- word gets around.

The biggest killer of porn is that the overall quality has gone down. For almost every outfit. There's only so much demand for Beavis and Butthead porn movies.

Too many stomach turners and yawners, too. Most guys and girls (yes, don't forget that 51% of porn is bought by women, in case you've forgotten) don't really go for the weird, the extreme, the homo or the bestial. The stuff that sells best year after year is the old fashioned good- looking couple, babe and buff, going at it. If you want to make the money, that is what you do. The outfits that insist on using the models that only do lesbian, for example, are missing out on a lot of money.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:37 am
by camaban
Billbo wrote:There are too many tease sites and tease materials out there. Some sites, like Twistys, have some really nice looking women, but every photoshoot of the last year is a dildo shoot. Really gets old. 20 sets of even the prettiest girl gets old when it is exactly the same subject matter. Even my long time favorite model to look at, Zuzana Drabinova, gets somewhat old after seeing 100 sets of exactly the same thing. To paraphrase Richard II, my bank account for a b/g scene from some of these women...


Like the well known Sineplex sofa in the same room over and over again!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:38 am
by bakerboy
The stuff that sells best year after year is the old fashioned good- looking couple, babe and buff, going at it.


Agree, that must be most polular ( always was) BUT definitely NOT the best seller. Why? Because this is the stuf mostly found for free on the "tube" type sites. I agree more with this:

Be nice to see more niche markets, or something with a little more interest.


This exists BUT usually gets lost among the "meat and potato" sex.

An overdose ? Yes indeed just look at the posts here. "You've seen one gangbang you'v seen them all".

Saturated with porn

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:20 am
by stefano sadistiko
This is nothing new . For alot of people it is only about being rich . :evil: It is quantity over quality . :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:50 am
by Billbo
Well, Vivid's video branch alone has more than $100 million in sales, more than 3 times that of its nearest competitor, Private, and if one adds in all the other stuff, like websites, graphic novels, etc., their income yearly is several billion. All built on the old standby of a good-looking woman and a muscular man having sex.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:39 am
by superduper
What I reckon is a lot of porn is just passable, but doesn't really make you want to jerk off there and then, it's like wallpaper; and only about 10 percent is really good stuff. For me, a really beautiful girl being given a good anal pounding, then cum in the mouth and ass simultaneously - then sucking off a cum-soaked cock, and further anal after cum shot into the ass. But if a girl will do this, she often isn't really good-looking. I reckon it's hard to get a real beauty to do the total fantasy. They tend to be a bit reserved.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:46 am
by superduper
To add to what I said, if only Claudia Jamsson would make a cumback and do a scene like that with 3 guys, rotating, fucking her in the ass, pussy and mouth, then cumming in her mouth, so she sucks off cum-soaked cocks, then shots of cum into her ass, and further anal with the cum-lubricated ass. I could die happy after seeing that.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:50 am
by superduper
To add further to that - she does 2 scenes, one as a blonde and one with dark hair, with the same sort of action.

But my point is, the reallybeautiful girls don't often (or not enough) do really great stuff like that, and when you get a fantasy filth session like that, if the girl is just so-so, you don't really care much.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:59 pm
by paroxysmia
camaban wrote:Like the well known Sineplex sofa in the same room over and over again!


:lol:

Maybe Ikea is not present in Russia... or too expensive ! :roll:

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:50 pm
by camaban
superduper wrote:What I reckon is a lot of porn is just passable, but doesn't really make you want to jerk off there and then, it's like wallpaper; and only about 10 percent is really good stuff. For me, a really beautiful girl being given a good anal pounding, then cum in the mouth and ass simultaneously - then sucking off a cum-soaked cock, and further anal after cum shot into the ass. But if a girl will do this, she often isn't really good-looking. I reckon it's hard to get a real beauty to do the total fantasy. They tend to be a bit reserved.

No for me good porn is more. Anal or not, facial or not is not the important thing. It's that all actors are into it, that there's chemistry among them. Then you need a real good male actor who knows how to handle the girl the right way. Also a good director telling clearly what he wants and expect from the scene. And then the camerawork and lightning is very important too. All in all it's not very easy to shoot good porn. CC is a master in this, but many so called "directors" who are out there today have no clue about this job. That's why many films are just average or beyond.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:12 pm
by superduper
'Tis true, a lot of porn is poorly directed.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:21 pm
by laura
personally at my current stage in life i cant get enough of porn and am quite happy to watch it all day. I guess i have not seen enough porn yet to get bored of it and at the moment find a sexy girl being fucked in all her holes by a fit bloke on a grubby sofa a massive turn on. I guess eventually i will start to find this a little samey like the rest of you. Tho i guess my tastes are a lot more extreme than most other women it is nice to read that 51% of porn is consumed by us girls - brings a little smile to my face to read that! :)