Page 1 of 1

Labels with crappy quality !

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:30 pm
by gapelover
Be warned to get cheap, bad quality if you'll buy movies from these labels ! IMO :twisted:

Testosteron
Legal Pink
Collateral Damage

Re: Labels with crappy quality !

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:06 pm
by dap-addict
gapelover wrote:Be warned to get cheap, bad quality if you'll buy movies from these labels ! IMO :twisted:

Testosteron
Legal Pink
Collateral Damage

The worst of them is Testosteron.
While Collateral Damage got a lot better in their newer movies I think.
Another one to add is Nexxxt Generation, a Collateral Damage spring up, I think.

Re: Labels with crappy quality !

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 1:32 pm
by Joey_Starr
gapelover wrote:Be warned to get cheap, bad quality if you'll buy movies from these labels ! IMO :twisted:

Testosteron
Legal Pink
Collateral Damage


I don't quite agree about Legal Pink/Playhouse, I've got half a dozen or so DVDs from them and they are very good, except one which for some reason only shows the picture in the middle of the screen (no full screen possible) and bad quality. Otherwise it's all good and some scorching hot scenes and sexy babes, but I've yet to see the latest DVDs all mine were released a year or two ago.

hmmm, ....

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 2:30 pm
by Mr_White
.... I used to have a couple of films from Collateral Damage and I did not find anything to complain about.

Legal Pink I did never try, but I absolutely agree that Testosteron movies do have very low quality.

So do have the old Hustler discs (not the original ones from the US, but those which have been manufactured in Europe).

PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:37 pm
by Mr. Peter
I also dont agree on Legal Pink, Playhous, Collateral Damage or Nexxt Generation. They have a lot of soft movies, but also a lot of hardcore anal stuff with eurobabes. Many of them feature the most known male actors we like...
And the lastest movies for ex. from Collateral (shot in HD) have great picture quality.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:40 pm
by gapelover
Mr. Peter wrote:I also dont agree on Legal Pink, Playhous, Collateral Damage or Nexxt Generation. They have a lot of soft movies, but also a lot of hardcore anal stuff with eurobabes. Many of them feature the most known male actors we like...
And the lastest movies for ex. from Collateral (shot in HD) have great picture quality.

Since which titles Collateral have great picture quality ?
All the other labels mentioned above have bad picture quality at least in my DVD player, maybe the US version of these labels is another one than the Euro version ?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:10 pm
by dap-addict
Mr. Peter wrote:I also dont agree on Legal Pink, Playhous, Collateral Damage or Nexxt Generation.

I checked them again over the weekend and you are right as far as the video/picture quality is concerned, Mr. Peter.
I dont like their light, though. With Collateral it used to be very reddish in the earler dvds, now its bright, more yellowish, but looks too unnatural, too plastic. But lighting is not the same as picture quality.

Real bad in this terms is only Testosteron still. :(

PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 4:56 pm
by Mr. Peter
Sure Ive seen Euro versions directly imported from Netherlands.

By pictures Q I mean technical aspects of the actual image (clearness, color cast, resolution,...), not lighting, etc. Last Ive seen I think one of their Best of series and it was perfect in terms of PQ (at least conpared to another porn titles, not mainstream movies of course..)

PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 5:44 pm
by Joey_Starr
About Legal Pink, most of the ones I've got (including the bad one mentioned earlier) were Australian licensed versions. I've got a few Euro originals as well.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:07 am
by porndog
Swank deserves mention under this topic. They have the worst editing. Most of the content looks good as far as production quality. But they have a monkey for an editor.

Re: Labels with crappy quality !

PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:45 pm
by ubertop
The technical quality is less important that the porn quality of the film.

These labels have produced the greatest and nastiest porn films ever seen :
Collateral Damage : Gang Me Gang Me
Legal Pink : Hey Teach Me To Bang

Compared to such fantastic series, most films appear boring !
I hope that Sineplex will learn from them !




gapelover wrote:Be warned to get cheap, bad quality if you'll buy movies from these labels ! IMO :twisted:

Testosteron
Legal Pink
Collateral Damage

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:27 pm
by Cactus Jack
Swank deserves mention under this topic. They have the worst editing. Most of the content looks good as far as production quality. But they have a monkey for an editor.


I agree. The quick cuts and edits are serious wood killers.
Donno what they are thinking really?

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:22 pm
by Mr. Peter
I havent watched Swank movies yet, but in Collateral Damage and Legal Pink movies there are also sometimes too much cuts in the scenes. Even gaping is cut out.