Page 1 of 1

Beauty vs Action

PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:39 pm
by superduper
Would you rather see some very beautiful girl in moderate action or a less beautiful but okay girl in harder action ?

Re: Beauty vs Action

PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:41 am
by IMaRetArd
like with all, everything is relative.... i cant say one or the other since it depends on mood. sometimes i prefer one and next the other. taste and variation is the best 8) . i would have to say more beautiful girls if i would have to choose, even if i then talk about girls that are almost unnaturally beautiful. reason for it is becasue if so then the action gets a higher turn on level thx to the girl anyway. what speaks in favor for the not as beautiful but harder action, i definetly love the more normal natural girls as well. It feels more down to earth and raw and so can sometimes even b better. but like i said....its all relative :D . i stand by my decision on the more beautiful girls since its what makes the stars stars :mrgreen: ....ofc extremely beautiful AND that does harder stuff isnt exactly a bad idea either right? :lol:

Re: Beauty vs Action

PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:09 am
by Patrick2
Looks are important but I'd rather watch an attractive or semi-atractive woman do a great sex scene than a super gorgeous woman do an avergae to poor one. I often find that the proper application of makeup and lighting can make a semi attractive girl look so much better. In return a reaaly beutiful girl with bad makeup and crappy lighting will look bland.

Re: Beauty vs Action

PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:59 am
by dejanbear
Beauty!
If girl isn't great i don't even watch action :)

Re: Beauty vs Action

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:01 am
by Xenomorgue
Patrick2 wrote:Looks are important but I'd rather watch an attractive or semi-atractive woman do a great sex scene, than a super gorgeous woman do an average to poor one.

Yeah, that is also my preference.

There are so many shitty B-companies out there, who are only in the porn business for the money. These companies work with mediocre directors who lack imagination, mediocre cameramen, etc. No wonder the scenes they shoot are crap. My experience is that such scenes can be not rescued even if there are gorgeous women performing. Over the years I have often made the mistake of trusting box covers from mediocre companies, and I ended up with average porn with no replay value.

Now I know that it is much better to go for the top companies. They have the best directors. A good director working with an enthusiastic but semi-attractive girl can create a fantastic scene.

Re: Beauty vs Action

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:56 pm
by alpha68
It's like asking what's worse, being ugly or stupid, it sucks both.

Re: Beauty vs Action

PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:40 am
by Xenomorgue
^ The original poster asked for our preference, not for an analogy.

Re: Beauty vs Action

PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 9:53 am
by fallon
Beauty!

Though I'm aware of the Fact, that most Posters on here rather watch ZsaZsa Gabor doing Double Anal than watching Jessica Alba nude... :roll:

Re: Beauty vs Action

PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:03 pm
by Xenomorgue
I will illustrate by preference for Hot Action over Beauty by comparing two DP movies.

"3 Black Dicks and a Spanish Chick 5" from Evasive Angles, directed by TT Boy.
Cute Brazilian girls. Hot energetic action well captured on film. Very good movie.

"DP fanatics 1" from 21Sextury, directed by John Walton.
Gorgeous European porn stars. Standard sex scenes on auto-pilot. Movie is okay.