As always, for dap-addict only the act counts. Take as many dicks in the ass as possible, then it's a good girl and scene. The rest is unimportant. And not only with him, I have the impression that many members here didn't care very much about the quality of a scene (male actor, director, location, tease, camerawork, chemistry, ...), only for the act that is done by the girl. Why are so many satisfied with so little?
In comparison to especially Russian porn, US porn is much better regarding the quality around a scene (location, camera, tease before the scene - only watch one of the movies Elegant Angel released last year, and you know what I mean). What makes it worst is the shit acting of many girls and - too often - the lack of anal. On the other side Russians very often do the same fake moans throughout the whole scene - also not very stimulating. The performance of the girls in Buda, the willingness of the Russian girls to do extreme acts and the quality around that US porn delivers, that could make really good scenes. But in my opinion you only get this from very few directors (CC, Rocco). Since years I think we need more quality porn. But it seems many are very satisfied as long as there's at least anal in a scene. But as long as the majority of consumers don't demand for better porn, nothing will change.
To the poll: My vote goes to Madison, only because she has done many really good scenes last year and because she likes what she's doing. She makes you hot while watching her. Alysa first has done more scenes outside of Russia, maybe this comparison is one year too early for her.
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 7:16 pm
