gapelover wrote:bubblebob wrote:gapelover wrote:you need to be previous members or purchased something,
Aaaah, so they don't want new customers. They really could have told us from the start...

Sure if they have enough, they don't need to get stealer's.

Thats the way of exclusive porn will be produced in the future.
Huh? This makes absolutely no business sense - with no disrespect intended towards Gapelover, if this is what Sineplex actually think, then it's just plain stupid.
If a production company (or any company for that matter) deliberately limits it's fiscal input, ie: it's potential profit margins, then it is in theory, doomed to abject failure - let's face it, Sineplex haven't exactly got a great track record/history when it comes to making wise, logical, or just simple good choices in it's business practice...
If membership is limited to purely existing members
only, then it is a recipe for disaster - a bigger customer base means more money coming into the company, therefore more finances to actually fund production, add to this the overly-complicated method for ordering their product for existing customers, and it means they're much more likely to lose business as a result - this nonsense saying that ''...they don't need stealers'' is insane - how can somebody be a stealer if they are
paying member???!!
I used to really like the Sineplex style and it's product - especially the models - at least they still have good instincts when it comes to finding new talent, sadly it's seems it's the only thing they're doing right these days.
Peace,
PG
