NoRestNetwork-NoRest4TheAss-Dildo&Fistin-MadPerv-GagsGirls

[shark1]

I always thought his scenes, amazing though the content is, was always ruined on account of everything he ever films being so bloody blurry and/or out of focus. I think i can pretty much spot all his 'other projects' on account of the settings and acts, yes, but more significantly the totally unwatcheable blurry picture.
It totally baffles me why anyone would shoot in 1080p and have less clarity in their output than a good 480p file!

Couldn't agree more! Truly some of the worst quality 1080P ever recorded! It is amazing that he doesn't bother improving the quality of his vids. I could never pay for a membership only to get pissed off because I was watching a gorgeous blurry girl get fucked in her blurry ass! It's an insult to HD that he posts 'shot in HD' on his site! On the plus side, at least membership is only $9.95/month for those who can stand it.

[gapelover]

The new layout looks good.

[AgentArgo]

I always thought his scenes, amazing though the content is, was always ruined on account of everything he ever films being so bloody blurry and/or out of focus. I think i can pretty much spot all his 'other projects' on account of the settings and acts, yes, but more significantly the totally unwatcheable blurry picture.
It totally baffles me why anyone would shoot in 1080p and have less clarity in their output than a good 480p file!

Couldn't agree more! Truly some of the worst quality 1080P ever recorded! It is amazing that he doesn't bother improving the quality of his vids. I could never pay for a membership only to get pissed off because I was watching a gorgeous blurry girl get fucked in her blurry ass! It's an insult to HD that he posts 'shot in HD' on his site! On the plus side, at least membership is only $9.95/month for those who can stand it.

I don't think it is the way it is shot, I think it is the way it has been encoded. Perhaps someone could teach them how to properly encode from the master so it doesn't look all blurry. I think it has to do with the framerate, they are shooting at a different rate than exporting.

[bubblebob]

I always thought his scenes, amazing though the content is, was always ruined on account of everything he ever films being so bloody blurry and/or out of focus. I think i can pretty much spot all his 'other projects' on account of the settings and acts, yes, but more significantly the totally unwatcheable blurry picture.
It totally baffles me why anyone would shoot in 1080p and have less clarity in their output than a good 480p file!

Couldn't agree more! Truly some of the worst quality 1080P ever recorded! It is amazing that he doesn't bother improving the quality of his vids. I could never pay for a membership only to get pissed off because I was watching a gorgeous blurry girl get fucked in her blurry ass! It's an insult to HD that he posts 'shot in HD' on his site! On the plus side, at least membership is only $9.95/month for those who can stand it.

I don't think it is the way it is shot, I think it is the way it has been encoded. Perhaps someone could teach them how to properly encode from the master so it doesn't look all blurry. I think it has to do with the framerate, they are shooting at a different rate than exporting.

And while they are at it P Woodman could use a workshop on that too - regardless of the sometimes ridiculous high file sizes some of the scenes are terribly blocky in motion.

[shark1]

I always thought his scenes, amazing though the content is, was always ruined on account of everything he ever films being so bloody blurry and/or out of focus. I think i can pretty much spot all his 'other projects' on account of the settings and acts, yes, but more significantly the totally unwatcheable blurry picture.
It totally baffles me why anyone would shoot in 1080p and have less clarity in their output than a good 480p file!

Couldn't agree more! Truly some of the worst quality 1080P ever recorded! It is amazing that he doesn't bother improving the quality of his vids. I could never pay for a membership only to get pissed off because I was watching a gorgeous blurry girl get fucked in her blurry ass! It's an insult to HD that he posts 'shot in HD' on his site! On the plus side, at least membership is only $9.95/month for those who can stand it.

I don't think it is the way it is shot, I think it is the way it has been encoded. Perhaps someone could teach them how to properly encode from the master so it doesn't look all blurry. I think it has to do with the framerate, they are shooting at a different rate than exporting.

And while they are at it P Woodman could use a workshop on that too - regardless of the sometimes ridiculous high file sizes some of the scenes are terribly blocky in motion. [/quote]


Very much agree, Woodmans HD is a poor man's HD as well, which is why I wouldnt ever join his site either.

[Pierre Woodman]

Don't worry with 1,5 millions visitors by months I get enough nice fans to support my work and not think I'm " a poor HD man " !!!

PW

[sinspector]

^^
it seems just a bit strange to me that you don't take this suggestion as it is.. i mean, if you could make your product better, why don't you just do that. maybe you could get even more fans then..

sinspector.

[Pierre Woodman]

Better ??? What does it means better ??? better for you or even for me does not mean neccessary better for the actual market ! And better for what ??? to help the piracy to get more money faster ???
The day this market will correspond to a normal world, maybe i will change my way to do, but at the moment what I do is successful and is what the majority wish to see, so I keep going !!!
About 3 millions visitors, yes could be cool of course but you here writting or doing good speech are anonymous, it's easy but it will be probabily fun to know who gives all thoses advises and what
are their statistics !!! I'm not so sure if all was visible they will have the same language !
The term quality is not an effective standart similar for everybody ! I just watched the mainstream film "contraband" with Mark Wahlberg and I loved it a lot but my girlfriend says " fuck, no good
that movie, why the picture is out of focus and moving all the time like if the director has parkinson disease " !!!
And it's Hollywood man, so do not judge with your own criter only, watch where I'am on Alexa, the way most people speak about my business, and then think a little !!! 15 years ago I told to Milton
at Private : " I do the casting line because it's like reporting, but you can paid what ever you want, I will never do gonzo, it's just shit "
Two years later I started Superfuckers ... not because i wanted make it but because THE MARKET makes the law, not you or me !!!

PW

[dap-addict]

Redesign is nice ... But worthless without updates...

Finally!
Redesign is just the first step...as far as I am informed updates should follow soon!

[bubblebob]

Better ??? What does it means better ??? better for you or even for me does not mean neccessary better for the actual market ! And better for what ??? to help the piracy to get more money faster ???

Now where is this piracy stuff coming from again?

My own point was basically - of all the websites I had joined that were offering videos in HD, yours were the lowest in quality while also being the biggest in filesize. If you'd change this it would be a win for both sides - your fans get better quality videos, while you save money for server and bandwidth costs, as your files could be smaller with better quality. Win-win situation if you'd ask me.

[gapeman]

There are scenes of 600 mb that has better quality that some scenes of
4gb ...so the secret is mainly the edition and the compresion program to get the final result with best quality and lowest weight of the file

[sinspector]

Redesign is just the first step...as far as I am informed updates should follow soon!

..yes, i hope so, because i joined already do you have any idea how long it will take to get fresh stuff? greetings,

sinspector.

[STEMCELL]

What´s with the Kelsie gang bang scene?? Most wanted

[Mr. Peter]

... not because i wanted make it but because THE MARKET makes the law, not you or me !!!

PW

+1 Petrified!

Wish this read all the beginning artists that first try to do only what they like and wonder why no money comes.

Personal note: Is it that right you do your casting part to satisfy your personal wishes and the rest of course for the market? Or is there anything else that you would like to shoot for yourself?

[Pierre Woodman]

During the shoot it's a mixt of what i like and what my fans like !!! For instance I don't like gape or squirt but i do it for them !!!
About shooting I prefer huge production like I did in past than gonzo, but I like speak with new girls every day ...

PW