YOUR COMMENT ABOUT SUSANA SPEARS

You cannot post any new comments.
Please use our forum if you want to contribute.

2887 comments, page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145:

2006-10-11 23:24   Eric Dillon


Finally something intelligent.

2006-10-11 23:18   Big Bear


Part 3....

The Iranians were delighted. Their agents, the North Koreans, from whom Tehran has bought its missile systems and its nuclear weapons systems, had demonstrated that in the event of the expected American bombing, Tehran would be able to launch weapons in all directions. Tehran also knew that American signals-intelligence watched everything and understood the message.

The remaining component was the nuclear warhead itself. It is logical, and now confirmed, that Iranian agents were present at the test site, since they both ordered and paid for the test. It is logical, though not confirmed, that the agents were the same mix that was present at the July 4 missile exercise, either Pasdaran officers or Iranian Nuclear Energy Agency ops or Iranian intelligence ops, or all of the above. It is logical, though not confirmed, that the same device that was detonated is the miniaturized warhead that Iran needs to mount atop its rebuilt Taepodong-2 missile, a version of which Tehran calls the Shahab-3. It is logical, though not confirmed, that Iran wanted the American national security apparatus to see that the two critical elements in a mutually assured destruction scenario are now in place: a launch-on-warning missile offensive and a nuclear warhead for the outgoing strike.

The U.N. Security Council warned the North Koreans not to fire the nuke or else. The U.N. Security Council warned the Iranians that it must cease enrichment of uranium or else.

The else clock is running. The six-party talks in East Asia to contain Pyongyang are a sham. The European Union talks in Geneva to contain Tehran are a sham. The U.N. Security Council talks in New York to contain the nuclear weapons proliferators are a sham. The only confab to wait out is the Congressional elections. After that, and regardless of how much noise the appeasers make in the House of Representatives, the fleet sails to defend America and enforce civilization.

2006-10-11 23:15   Big Bear


Great Article
Persian Hands Part 1

By JOHN BATCHELOR
October 10, 2006
New York Sun

Why did the North Koreans detonate a nuclear weapon now? Who benefits from a clear defiance of the United Nations Security Council? What possible gain could North Korea's utilitarian despot achieve by humiliating his protector, Beijing, by baiting his enabler, Seoul, and by threatening his adversary, America, in defense of its ally Japan?

Answer this question and you can begin to answer the scale of the threat posed by the North Korean test. Answer this question and you begin to see that the Bush administration faces an enemy that is well prepared to beggar commerce, wreck security, and blackmail the Security Council unless it gets what it wants. Answer this question and you will see that the hands on the nuke weapons test are not Korean but Persian.

Recall three months ago, when North Korea raised an intercontinental ballistic missile on the launch pad and taunted Beijing, Seoul, and Tokyo for weeks before firing the weapon into the Japan Sea. At the time, Washington was accused of provoking North Korea by refusing to negotiate face-to-face and by spurning North Korea's demand for an American guarantee not to attack. Madeleine Albright recently called President Bush's foreign policy a "mess" and said he should have used Bill Clinton as a special negotiator with Pyongyang to defuse the confrontation. Horsefeathers. On July 4, North Korea launched at least seven missiles within a short time span, one of which was a Taepodong-2 missile capable of carrying a miniaturized nuclear warhead, not because Mr. Bush wouldn't telephone Kim Jong Il's bunker but because the test was paid for by, and staged for, Tehran.

2006-10-11 20:50   FCF


It takes sacrifice you fat cunt - something that you assholes wouldnt know anything about.

2006-10-11 20:46   Foreskin Cheese Factory


Now that I kicked your ass I am going to go and jerk off on my wife's face. YEAH!

2006-10-11 20:44   Anon


'Without us Americans'

Yeah, doing a great job in Iraq you tosser. What's the latest tally?

Three , four, five thousand is it?

I wonder if you'll top the Vietnam total? Only another fifty thousand or so to go :D

2006-10-11 20:37   Big Bear


I think Susana would vote Republican - I think there for I am Conservative!

2006-10-11 20:34   Foreskin Cheese Factory


Anon you European fuck wad. With out us Americans you would either be goose stepping to Herr Hitler or sitting in some frozen shitpile in Russia. We are the oldest continous democracy in the world. Half of the cities in Europe are half fucking Muslim and the way your birthrates look in 20 years there won't be any of you spinless motherfuckers left. Great job in Bosnia fuck face - we had to come over here to stop that too.

2006-10-11 18:15   Anon


@ Foreskin Cheese Factory:

FUCK YEAH! Rad dude, like that's totally mothefuckin AWESOME! WOO! Yeah, USA, USA, USA!

You utter twat.

2006-10-11 15:59   Daddy Long Dong


North Korea is China's problem. They are the ones that are facing an arms race in their front yards. The Japs will start to rearm themselves in response to this and India will deploy stronger weapons too. This will help contain China - or at least hamstring them. I hope we stay out of this one. If NK starts to posture in really dangerious way we could swat the fuck out of them.

2006-10-11 13:40   Foreskin Cheese Factory


Well I am glad that she is growing her hair - not that I mind how she looks right now but I think she was all around hotter without the bangs. That last pic was so hot that I'm going to go cream on the wife's face with some nice thick baby batter. America! Fuck ya! I think we need to hit those smug little North Korean motherfuckers with some cruise missles. YEAH!

2006-10-11 04:11   me


i don't like how she looks in the new set, well only the hair I don't like, everything else i love it

2006-10-11 01:04   anonymous


http://www.viewpornstars.com/samples/7viewpornstarsss3018_s.jpg

2006-10-10 00:22   kwik


Not sure why you posted a set of Sandy, Trout. But she looks fucking stupid with the boob job.

me, that is a really nice Susana set. One of the better looking ones I have seen in a while. Wish she would do more and more of that kind of work.

2006-10-09 07:59   Trout


h t t p : / / www.sandyfantasy.net/oct06/cowboy_babe/sandy1.html

2006-10-09 07:04   me


http://www. p e t e r j a n h a n s.com/tgp/tgp_gallery_issue136.php

2006-10-08 16:47   willis fan


http://rap 1 D share.de/files/30523403/Susana_Spears_-_Villa.zip

check this out! she looks beautiful in this set

2006-10-08 13:18   The Insider


Hey "me" - Nice pics but that site has absolutely nothing to do with Susana. Keep it real dude - you have a penis between your legs - don't mis reprisent yourself.

2006-10-08 07:55   me


http://www.angelicpornstars.com/susana-spears/black-dress/susana11.html

new set

2006-10-08 07:31   willis fan


thanks dundelheimer, there are a lot of sets there, and not only from susana!